tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 10 15:30:50 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: A construction that seems...unusual.

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: A construction that seems...unusual.
• Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 18:30:15 EST

I wanted to check and see if there were major flaws in this dialogue:

' wa'Hu' chuSqu'moH nuq ? ' tlhobta' qama'.

qama' ja'ta' 'avwI' , ' lujchu'pu' toDwI'pu'qoq. nItoD'e' lunIDtaHvIS 
Heghpu'be'wI'pu'bogh DImuHta' ! ' 

Haghta' 'avwI' .

(It's that Heghpu'be'wI'pu'bogh construction that concerns me...the pu' - pu' 
just doesn't look right...but ...)

juDmoS

• Prev by Date: RE: Hegh vavnI'wI'
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: Hol vI'lo 'e' vInID (vagh)
• Prev by thread: Re: RE: KLBC: Hol vI'lo 'e' vInID (vagh)
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC: A construction that seems...unusual.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level