tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 10 06:16:39 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:16:18 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Thu, 09 Dec 1999 18:41:48 -0600 Daniel Morse
<[email protected]> wrote:
> SoQ qelchu'chugh wot {jang}, vaj chaq luqel je wotmey {ghel}, {ra'}, {jach},
> qar'a'?
muja'chuq *Okrand* jIH je. *quotation* Dalo'DI' mumey <<ja',
jatlh>> joq neH Dalo'laH. latlh lajbe'lu'bej. chaq pIq choH
*Okrand* qech, 'ach DaH Qu'vamvaD <<jang>> lo'laHbe'bej vay'.
HolQeD (Dec 98) p7 yIlaD.
> ghu'na' vISov vIneHbej.
DaH DaSov'a'?
> peHruS
charghwI'
> TPO wrote:
>
> > >> ... after TKD we have the interview in HolQeD 28
> > >> (Dec 98) p7 "He asked me. He said, 'blah, blah, blah.'"
> > >
> > >
> > >toH! Then "jIjang: <blah, blah, blah>" works as well as "jIjang. jIja'
> > ><blah, blah, blah>"? What a relief! And is "<blah, blah, blah> jIjang"
> > >kosher too?
> >
> > The way I read the interview, if you are "quoting" what was said then you
> > use jatlh (or ja').
> >
> > DloraH