Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>

["William H. Martin" <whm2m@virginia.edu>]

On Thu, 09 Dec 1999 18:41:48 -0600 Daniel Morse 
<westphalwz@earthlink.net> wrote:

> SoQ qelchu'chugh wot {jang}, vaj chaq luqel je wotmey {ghel}, {ra'}, {jach},
> qar'a'?

muja'chuq *Okrand* jIH je. *quotation* Dalo'DI' mumey <<ja', 
jatlh>> joq neH Dalo'laH. latlh lajbe'lu'bej. chaq pIq choH 
*Okrand* qech, 'ach DaH Qu'vamvaD <<jang>> lo'laHbe'bej vay'. 
HolQeD (Dec 98) p7 yIlaD.
 
> ghu'na' vISov vIneHbej.

DaH DaSov'a'?
 
> peHruS

charghwI'
 
> TPO wrote:
> 
> > >> ... after TKD we have the interview in HolQeD 28
> > >> (Dec 98) p7 "He asked me. He said, 'blah, blah, blah.'"
> > >
> > >
> > >toH!  Then "jIjang: <blah, blah, blah>" works as well as "jIjang. jIja'
> > ><blah, blah, blah>"? What a relief! And is "<blah, blah, blah> jIjang"
> > >kosher too?
> >
> > The way I read the interview, if you are "quoting" what was said then you
> > use jatlh (or ja').
> >
> > DloraH