tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 09 17:44:37 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>

• From: Daniel Morse <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
• Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 18:41:48 -0600
• References: <[email protected]>

SoQ qelchu'chugh wot {jang}, vaj chaq luqel je wotmey {ghel}, {ra'}, {jach},
qar'a'?

ghu'na' vISov vIneHbej.

peHruS

TPO wrote:

> >> ... after TKD we have the interview in HolQeD 28
> >> (Dec 98) p7 "He asked me. He said, 'blah, blah, blah.'"
> >
> >
> >toH!  Then "jIjang: <blah, blah, blah>" works as well as "jIjang. jIja'
> ><blah, blah, blah>"? What a relief! And is "<blah, blah, blah> jIjang"
> >kosher too?
>
> The way I read the interview, if you are "quoting" what was said then you
> use jatlh (or ja').
>
> DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
    • From: TPO <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qISmaS
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: Noun Suffixes with Numbers
• Prev by thread: Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
• Next by thread: Re: jang. ja' <blah, blah, blah>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level