tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 07 14:49:35 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: adverb suffixes???

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: adverb suffixes???
• Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 01:31:27 -0500
• Organization: Microsoft Corporation
• References: <CBD6795F70A5D211B2B20008C733321AE0B8B7@INFINITI2>

> OK, I admit it. I *like* the idea of <-qu'> on many of the adverbials,
> especially <nom> and <QIt>. Unfortunately, liking the idea does not make
it
> valid. I wouldn't complian if you used <nomqu'> in conversation (and I
might
> not even notice), but while I'm the BG answering grammar questions, this
is
> strictly a no no.


In conversation, you can simply stress the adverbial.


***nom*** yItI', chamwI'!
Fix it QUICKLY, technician!


SuStel
Stardate 99932.3

• References:
  • RE: adverb suffixes???
    • From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon in Spanish & French
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Hol vI'lo 'e' vInID
• Prev by thread: RE: adverb suffixes???
• Next by thread: Re: adverb suffixes???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level