tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 05 16:00:04 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The Klingon Year (was:Re: Qo'noS)
- From: J242110559@aol.com
- Subject: Re: The Klingon Year (was:Re: Qo'noS)
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 18:59:48 EST
>my natural assumtion that a <loghqam> represents the distace
>traveled by light in one <DIS>.
>Why need it have to do with a <DIS>? We could go back to deriving Klingon
>angle measurements; after all, here on Earth we measure astronomical
>distances in parsecs, which are seconds of parallax, related to the
>angle-measure of one second. A parsec is about 3.26 light years, and IS
>actually used as a distance measurement. Now set that assumption churning
>and you can easily work out completely reliable figures for Klingon angle
>measures and the radius of its orbit. Amazing what you can get from a few
>sentences, isn't it?
It's all just speculation. I rather like quljIb's idea.