tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 22 12:01:17 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: reH Su'ba'pa' quS yInuD. / KLBC

• From: Pillow <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: reH Su'ba'pa' quS yInuD. / KLBC
• Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 11:01:35 -0800
• References: <[email protected]>

>
> > Say'law'taH  yopwaH  HomwIj  'e'  vItu'.

            pagh, I meant to write: <Say'law'taH yopwaHHomwIj 'e' vItu'.>

> >
> > 'ach  loQ  'o'wIj  ('o' ngechwIj?)  Humlaw'taw'.

            did I really write <-taw'>?!?  nuq ngaSlaw'pu'  Dargh HIvje'wIj?

            an idiot would know I should have used <-taH>.

>
> > DIrwIjvo'  Qopchu'meH  pughHom  Hum  'ej
> > vIloSnISta'.      [i hope "be worn out" works for "be worn off".What
> would        be the tlhIngan Hol equivalent of "erode"?]

..........jInIDqa'taH.............................                    pIl'o'

ps.    teHtaH  lutwIj.

• References:
  • Re: reH Su'ba'pa' quS yInuD. / KLBC
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: reH Su'ba'pa' quS yInuD. / KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: Information overload, or {Qu'vaD lI' De'vam}
• Prev by thread: Re: reH Su'ba'pa' quS yInuD. / KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: reH Su'ba'pa' quS yInuD. / KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level