tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 04 12:58:03 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: *muSHa'* yImuSHa'!
- From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: *muSHa'* yImuSHa'!
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 15:16:53 -0500
At 09:38 AM 8/4/99 -0400, you wrote:an their opposites.
>
>I've actually made the opposite argument - that is, that the absence of a
>verb for "to love" indicates a society so brimming over with love that
>they don't even consider the need for a word for it. (Do fish have a word
>for water?)
They have a noun meaning love, "parmaq". Therefore they obviously do see a
need to verbalize the concept. Besides, how can you right love poetry
without the proper words?
SuSvaj
>
> joel anderson * http://members.aol.com/JPKlingon * [email protected]
> **mIghghachvo' yImej 'ej yIQaQ; roj yInej 'ej Dochvam yItlha'**
> **Depart from evil, and do good; Seek peace, and pursue it**
>
>
>
>