tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 26 16:03:59 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: taHjaj wo'
- From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: taHjaj wo'
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 15:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
---David Trimboli wrote:
>
> From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
>
>
> >DIS naQ jIloS jIH vIHevpa'.
>
> This is an interesting sentence, and I wanted to comment on it.
Interesting? I'd call it wrong. Thanks for catching me.
Had I checked my own work as it's my job to check other people's, I
might have said:
qaStaHvIS [tera'] DIS naQ jIloStaH jIH vIHevpa'.
DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.
I'm '... ugh, I accidentally deleted the rest of your messge. I think
Hoch and naQ both work here. An entire year, a whole year, all of a
year ...
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com