tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 04 13:07:45 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: buy' ngop?
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: buy' ngop?
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 15:04:30 -0500
At 11:34 PM 9/3/97 -0700, SuStel wrote:
>[email protected] on behalf of Terrence Donnelly wrote:
>> >yoHbogh SuvwI' matlh
>> >or
>> >matlhbogh SuvwI' yoH
>> >
>>
>> Actually, although I hope you are right, how did you arrive at this formula?
>> Only the first two formations are listed in the book ("X N 'ej Y" and
>> "X-bogh N 'ej Y-bogh"), I think. Is there canon to support the
>> "X-bogh N Y" form?
>
>Canon? There's no question that this works. Multiple verbs on a single noun
>was questionable, but this is simply a noun phrase modified by a relative
>clause.
[pe'...]
>You want canon? I didn't have any canon in mind when I constructed these.
>They just work according to the standard rules, no question. Let's see. Aha!
>
>yIntaHbogh tlhIngan Soj tlhol jablu'DI' HIvqu'lu'.
>Klingon food is best when served fresh and live. (SkyBox #S21)
>
Great. Works for me.
>--
>SuStel
>Stardate 97676.2
>
-- ter'eS
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/2711