tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 02 18:47:56 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: QIn
>Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 10:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
>
>ghItlh qoror:
>
>>I'm glad we got the word QIn. It's much smaller and succinct than
>>jabbI'ID, which we would otherwise be using.
>
>QIn = the expressed message
>jabbI'ID = the data in which it is imbedded
An interesting distinction, one I actually could really like... But what is
it based on? The definitions themselves don't seem so cut and dried to me.
~mark