tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 23 21:32:13 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: plans
ja' peHruS:
>Is your answer of the question of muHwI' without challenging his grammatical
>construction a sanction of this construction? muHwI' wrote:
>
>chay' tlhIngan Duj chenlu' 'e' vIbej vIneH
jIQumqu'taHvIS QaghHommeyHey vIbuSHa'.
pab vIpojchugh, maQum 'e' vInIS.
*I* customarily won't use a question as the object of a sentence this way,
but I can -- and will -- understand it when someone else does.
-- ghunchu'wI'