tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 27 02:32:14 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: bIQ'a' Doq bIngDaq



  "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]> wrote:-
> >  wa' loDvaD lutvetlh vIja'DI', "mu(be_jealous)moHmo' 'oH yIja'chuqbe'".
> "yI-" Dalo'DI', "-be'" yIlo'Qo'.  lugh "-Qo'"'e'.
> chaq "mu(be_jealous)moHbe'meH wIja'be'"?  qayajbe' 'e' vIHar.

  The man said "Don't tell me (of your diving there), as (telling me of those
dives) makes me jealous".

> > wa' ram 'oHDaq chalDaq maS Dechbogh gho tIn wov'e' leghlu'pu' 'ej novmey
> > loghDuj rur 'oH 'e' jatlhpu' wa' loD, 'ach neH muD QeD "halo" 'oHpu'.
> "'oHDaq"..?  nuqDaq?  "antecedent" vItu'be'.

  Replace {'oHDaq} by {pa'}

> "tInbogh gho wov" "wovbogh gho tIn" ghap ja'nISlu', qar'a'?  De'vetlh
> wIghojpu''a'?  chaq jIqawHa'.

  and:-

> >  Thistlegorm DujDI tInqu' noy DIleghpu'.
> DIp lutlha' cha' wot... mub'a'?  "noybogh DujDI tInqu'" ja'nISlu' 'e'
> vIqawlaw'.

  "Are more than one state verbs after one noun legal?" sounds like a query
for Okrand to sort out, unless there are canon examples of either {<noun>
<adj> <adj>} or of {<adj>bogh <noun> <adj>} (where <adj> means "state verb").


Back to archive top level