tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 23 19:57:43 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: DaHjaj Hat

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DaHjaj Hat
• Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 21:04:59 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

muja' charghwI':
>choyajHa', jupwI'. SatIch 'e' vIHarbe'bej.

vIlaj.  qay'Ha'.

>qochna' ghajbogh jup'e' vIqaDlaHbe'. tuqlIjmo' SoH HoS law' jIH
>HoS puS. nIteb tuq quv vISuvqangpa' SuS vISuvqang.

loQ jImer.  not mu'qaD veS 'eb buSHa' tlhIngan, qar'a'?
ghu'lIj vIqawnIS.  DuSIghlaw' 'oy'lIj.  qamawchugh jItlhIj jIH.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: DaHjaj Hat
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: understanding {-moH} (was Re: peDtaH 'ej jIQuch)
• Next by Date: Re: understanding {-lu'} (was Re: peDtaH 'ej jIQuch)
• Prev by thread: Re: DaHjaj Hat
• Next by thread: Okrand's oral rulings re grammar (was: Re: maHagh tlhInganpu')
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level