tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 21 11:39:11 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Hol chenmoHwi'pu' (was: Re: KLBC: insulting)
- From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Hol chenmoHwi'pu' (was: Re: KLBC: insulting)
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 12:47:40 -0700
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony.Appleyard [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 1997 2:41 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Hol chenmoHwi'pu' (was: Re: KLBC: insulting)
Qov wrote:-
> No one here predicted using jIH as the possessive for nouns of
relative
> position (i.e. we must say {jIH Dung} not {DungwIj} for "the
area above
> me.") and I don't remember ever hearing anyone doubt that
possessive
> suffixes could be used on such nouns. ...
Sorry: but please what is the printed source reference for
that rule?
KGT yIHaDqa'
pagh