tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 08 21:22:55 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Mole's tale
- From: "WATT FAMILY" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Mole's tale
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 15:12:17 +1000
don't sen this to [email protected] any more
----------
> From: [email protected]
> To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Mole's tale
> Date: Thursday, 6 November 1997 17:43
>
> In a message dated 97-11-04 14:54:09 EST, you write:
>
> << > There exists a possibility that
> > Klingon will evolve into two dialects: one based on canon and Okrand's
> > explanations, and one based on the actual, practical usage.
>
> pab'e' neH 'angpu'bogh Okrand reH vIlo' 'e' vInID. jIjatlhmeH motlh
qay'be'
>
> pab wISovbogh. pab chu' poQbe'lu'. pab chu' 'angchugh Okrand qabbe'
pab
> 'ach
> poQbe'lu'.
>
> I try to always use grammar which Okrand has revealed to us. I usually
have
>
> no trouble speaking with the grammar we know. We don't need new
grammar.
> It's not bad if Okrand gives us some, but we don't need it.
> >>
>
> Holmey pImbe' HutlhtaHbogh tlhIngan Hol'e' 'oghbogh Okrand lujatlh Hoch
> ghojwI'pu' 'e' vItulbej. tlhIngan Hol yejHaDDaq tlhIngan Hol'e' neH
'oghbogh
> Okrand wIghojmo' 'ej wIlo'mo' yejHaDvam vImuvta'. teH; yIn parHol
> *tlhIngan-aase* je; 'ach ta' Hol neH vIparHa'.
>
> I truly hope Klingon remains the Okrand language without other dialects.
One
> of the reasons I like being a KLI member is that we attempt to learn and
use
> only Okrand's Klingon. True, parHol and klingonaase exist; but I admire
only
> ta' Hol.
>
> peHruS