tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 08 21:22:55 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Mole's tale



don't sen this to [email protected] any more

----------
> From: [email protected]
> To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Mole's tale
> Date: Thursday, 6 November 1997 17:43
> 
> In a message dated 97-11-04 14:54:09 EST, you write:
> 
> << > There exists a possibility that
>  > Klingon will evolve into two dialects: one based on canon and Okrand's
>  > explanations, and one based on the actual, practical usage.
>  
>  pab'e' neH 'angpu'bogh Okrand reH vIlo' 'e' vInID.  jIjatlhmeH motlh
qay'be'
> 
>  pab wISovbogh.  pab chu' poQbe'lu'.  pab chu' 'angchugh Okrand qabbe'
pab
> 'ach 
>  poQbe'lu'.
>  
>  I try to always use grammar which Okrand has revealed to us.  I usually
have
> 
>  no trouble speaking with the grammar we know.  We don't need new
grammar.  
>  It's not bad if Okrand gives us some, but we don't need it.
>   >>
> 
> Holmey pImbe' HutlhtaHbogh tlhIngan Hol'e' 'oghbogh Okrand lujatlh Hoch
> ghojwI'pu' 'e' vItulbej.  tlhIngan Hol yejHaDDaq tlhIngan Hol'e' neH
'oghbogh
> Okrand wIghojmo' 'ej wIlo'mo' yejHaDvam vImuvta'.  teH; yIn parHol
> *tlhIngan-aase* je; 'ach ta' Hol neH vIparHa'.
> 
> I truly hope Klingon remains the Okrand language without other dialects. 
One
> of the reasons I like being a KLI member is that we attempt to learn and
use
> only Okrand's Klingon.  True, parHol and klingonaase exist; but I admire
only
> ta' Hol.
> 
> peHruS


Back to archive top level