tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 06 22:27:51 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Question-Relative Clause
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Question-Relative Clause
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 01:27:40 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-11-07 01:06:48 EST, you write:
<< We are not saying that "questions are not sentences." They most certainly
are. We are saying that the very existence of and grammatical structure of
{-bogh} makes it exceedingly unlikely that question words do the same job it
does. >>
peHruS here:
I am not saying that question words do the same job as {bogh} constructions.
I am saying that TKD 6.2.5 is very clear, to me, that {'e'} constructions
are two separate sentences and that {'e'} is the Object of the second
sentence; and, that same {'e'} refers back to the entire first sentence.
{bogh} constructions are valid. I do not disagree one wit.