ja' pagh: >I have to agree with charghwI' on the question as object thing: it >doesn't work. >[...] >mub'a' qechvam pagh Hat'a' qechvam? 'e' vISaHbe'. vIlo'Qo'. bIqID'a'? naDev Dalo'ta'qu'! -- ghunchu'wI'