tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 26 23:15:07 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: lIy Hale-Bopp
- From: Ivan A Derzhanski <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: lIy Hale-Bopp
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:19:56 -0800
- Organization: Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science
- References: <[email protected]>
David Trimboli wrote:
> As I have pointed out, {wew} means "glow," not "be glowing,"
What is the difference?
> so it cannot be used adjectivally.
`A verb expressing state or quality can be used immediately following
a noun to modify that noun' (_tKD_:49). Is there any reason to think
that {wew} `glow' doesn't express a state?
--'Iwvan
--
"reH Sov yInej 'ej Dap yImuS, <dOstI bA mardom-e dAnA nEkO-st,
jagh val qaq law' jup QIp qaq puS" do^sman-e dAnA beh az nAdAn dOst>
(Sheikh Muslihuddin Abu Muhammad Abdullah Saadi Shirazi)
Ivan A Derzhanski <[email protected]>
H: cplx Iztok bl 91, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria <http://www.math.acad.bg/~iad/>
W: Dept for Math Lx, Inst for Maths & CompSci, Bulg Acad of Sciences