tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 26 14:11:59 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Practicing...
jatlh SuStel:
> But the big mistake is that you have any object on {Quch} at all! Remember,
> {'e'} is not a sentence conjunction, it's an object. Just like a noun can be
> an object. So, if {'e'} is like any other object, what would *{targh vIQuch}
> mean, for instance? "I am happy the targ?" Nonsense! And it doesn't mean
> that I cause the targ to be happy, because that would be {targh vIQuchmoH}.
I get it now. That *was* my mistake, I was taking the "that"
translation of {'e'} too literally. DaH jIyaj! Maybe I'll get it right
below...
> Qu'vatlh!
> mu'tlheghmeywIj DalaDba'ta', 'ach chojangmeH DIvI' Hol Dalo' jay'!
> tlhIngan Hol yIjatlhchoH!
> qara'!
lu'! pIj tlhIngan Hol mu'mey vIlo' 'ej batlh vIlo' 'e' vIghoj.
lugh'a'?
-mIqIraH