tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 05 20:24:29 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jIHub'egh
>Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 22:22:56 -0800
>From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
>
>jatlh pIntIn ('ej mugh qaqen):
>
>> *Holtej* qavan!
>> (I salute you Holtej)
>>
>> jabbI'IDlIj mungeHta' *qaqen*. qatlho'. jabbI'ID wa'DIch chongeHbogh 'oS
>> Dochvam 'e' vIHar. vIquvmoHlu'.
>> (Ken sent me your transmission. I thank you. I believe that this letter
>> represents the first transmission which you sent me. I am honored.)
>
>yIjatlh: <jabbI'ID wa'DIch chongeHbogh 'oSlaw' Dochvam>. <'e' vIHar>
>bIjatlhnISbe'.
Sheez... chay' "nitpick" jatlhlu'? :)
>> "ngaqbogh" DaghItlhta'. (DIvI' Hol: which supports.) qay'ba'
>mu'tlheghvetlh
>> DIp Damo' ngaq. not wot loSlaH "ngaq". DaQochbe''a'?
>> (You wrote "ngaqbogh". (English: which supports.) That sentence definitely
>
>> is a problem, because "ngaq" behaves as a noun. "ngaq" can never represent
>a
>> verb. Do you agree?)
>
>ngoDvam tlhojpu' Holtej.
'ej pIj batlhHa' Qaghvam'e' vIQagh jIH (yes, I know this sounds weird as a
transitive use. But it's something to consider. I don't know if it's
correct).
>tlhob Human <bIQochbe''a'>. tlhob tlhInganna' <bIQoch'a'>? <DaQochbe''a'>
>yIjatlhQo'.
details...
>> "qo' ngo'"Daq "DuSaq jen" rInmoHta' puqbe'wI' qan.
>
>DuSaQ leghlu'meH, chalDaq leghnISlu'? ghobe' . . . vaj <DuSaQ jen>
>yIjatlhQo'!
Hey, it was in scare quotes, at leasy.
>> "Spanish" 'oH
>> be'nalwI' wa'DIch Sung Hol'e'
>
>Hmmm . . . wot 'oHbe' <Sung>'e'!
qar. 'ej mu'tlheghDaq, DIp'e' Da.
>> Do'Ha'. lalDan powI' vIvumbogh rura' pente'Daq (Siberia)
>> jIcheghlI'.
>
>pImbej *Siberia* rura' pente' je. *Siberia*Daq bIlengtaHchugh, vaj *Siberia*
>yIjatlh!
Hee.. *Siberia* DaSuchpa', "pIm" yIjatlhQo'! :)
>> De'wI'
>> vIghajbe'mo'. 'uSdu' ghajbe'boghchugh loD qetmeH Dara'laHbe' qar'a'?
>
>ghajbe'boghchugh?!
Woops. Looks like someone changed his mind midstream and didn't change the
suffix.
~mark