tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 15 07:47:50 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Re: We are klingons
- From: "Weaver SE (Steve)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Re: We are klingons
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 09:50:56 -0500
ja' Lieven:
>jatlhpu' SuStel:
>> heh . . .
>> tlhInganmey maH! ghom'a'mo' waw' wIjevlaH.
<...veQ vIteqta'...>
>2.- shouldn't that be tlhInganpu' ?
ghobe'
>3.- After that long "We are klingons"-Discussion,
> Why don't you say "thlIngan maH" ?
<...veQ vIteqta'...>
Because he means it as "We are Klingons (scattered all over the place)"
Read about Plural Noun Suffixes -Type 2 in TKD p23.
Hovjaj 97537.62
ramqu'! ramqu'! jatlh qup. ramqu' Hoch'e'.
Eccl. 12:8
----------------------------------------------------------------
Soqra'tIS [email protected]