tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 11 14:17:57 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Saj, 'ay' wejDIch
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Saj, 'ay' wejDIch
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Deborah Kay" at Jul 10, 97 05:49:10 pm
charghwI'vo:
QaghHomHeylIj vItu'law'bogh vI'angqa'.
According to Deborah Kay:
>
> negh law' lupoQ ta'
negh law' poQ ta'.
> 'ej SIbI' jImejnIS. be'nalwI', puqloDra' yIQorgh.
'Iv ja' vav? mu'tlheghDaq, 'Iv ra' vav? <<puqloDra'>>?
...
> wam loDHom neH, 'ach poH tu'lu'be'.
loQ mISlaH mu'tlheghvam. nuq DaHech:
wam loDHom neH. wamQo' latlhpu'.
wam loDHom neHtaH loDHom, 'ach Qu'vam chaw'be' latlh Qu'mey.
wam loDHom neHtaH SoSDaj, 'ach lobQo' loDHom.
...
> langchoHtaHvIS SoS Duy', ghaHvaD jach, <targhvaD Soj
> Dajab 'e' yImev!>
nuqjatlh? Duy''a' SoS?
> <qoH, bISopbe'chugh, vaj bIHegh. SaQorghbe'.>
toH! Duy'bej SoS!
> qul chenmoHmeH, naQmey boS loDHom, 'a naQ puS tu'lu'.
It's simpler, more common and no less meaningful to replace
{naQ puS tu'lu'} with {puS naQ}.
...
> targhvaD 'oH
> jabDI' loDHom, chaH QeHmoH 'oH.
QeHchoH 'Iv? SoS latlh je? 'Iv latlh? 'ej chaH QeHmoH nuq?
wanI'? ghu'? I offer:
targhvaD Sojvam jabmo' loDHom, QeHchoH.
> 'ach pagh jatlhtaH. nachDajDaq HeDlaw' SoS
> mInDu'.
DaDelchu'ta'.
..
> tujchoHmeH targh, mobDajDaq 'oH qat loDHom.
nuqjatlh? <<mobDajDaq>> vIyajbe'.
> rIn 'ay' wejDIch.
majQa'! 'ay' loSDIch vIloSmeH Qatlh Qu'!
> SanDar
charghwI'