tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 03 22:22:46 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon's looks
- From: "Ritz, Michael" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingon's looks
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 01:16:00 -0400
- Encoding: 40 TEXT
----------
From: Ruby M. Harper
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Klingon's looks
Date: Wednesday, July 02, 1997 1:16PM
Scott Inman wrote:
>
> Mr. Wakeman wrote:
>
> >Hi my name is Tim Wakeham (Klingon name: Kabron) and this is my first
> >message.
> >Klingons in the 23rd century (Kirk's time) look totally different to the
ones
> >in
> >the 24th century (Picard's time) now can someone please tell me why this
is.
> >
> >It has puzzled me for years and Klingons have never revealed to
outsiders.
> >Please can someone put me out of my misery.
>
> This is because of the Romulan influence. The Klingons in Kirk's time may
have had
> some minute amount of Romulan DNA in thier systems, which by Star Trek:
The Motion
> Picture, was eventually filtered out so that their DNA returned to true
Klingon DNA.
>
> If I am wrong, I welcome comments.
I would reply that it is because Paramount got a better make-up artist.
Regardless of the reason, I am grateful. Early Klingons gave me the
creeps, Worf, on the other hand, is almost TOO attractive. Of course,
there's no explaining Lursa and B'etor. Go figure ... the men are
better looking than the women.
>>>>NOT to other Klingons! {{{: -) >