tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 20 01:20:13 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: shades of meaning

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: shades of meaning
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 04:19:41 -0500 (EST)

In a message dated 97-01-19 20:08:54 EST, Caryn Law writes:

<< Dajqu'bogh paq vIlaD.
 I read a very interesting book.
  >>


While Dajqu'bogh paq is appears to be grammatically correct, why not simply
use paq Dajqu'.  After all, Daj is a stative verb, allowing it to act as an
adjective merely by following the noun it modifies.

peHruS

• Prev by Date: -wI' names (was Re: Much Ado about *only*)
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC:shades of meaning
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC: shades of meaning
• Next by thread: Noah - New Animal Search Engine!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level