tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 14 11:15:42 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "Grammarian" 'oS nuq

• From: "eric d. zay" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: "Grammarian" 'oS nuq
• Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 14:20:26 -0500

> >I have seen {pab po'wI'} used on this listserv and in HolQeD to express
> >"grammarian."
> 
> The list tends to use "pabpo'", though I have never heard that this usage
> was approved in canon (it's a noun-verb compound).  Then again, someone
> said Okrand did approve it.  I may not be remembering properly.

I thought noun-verb constructs were strictly out of bounds.  Did we get
some new info on this?

SuSvaj

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "Grammarian" 'oS nuq
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Sorta new ["End transmission"]
• Next by Date: KLBC: tea for two
• Prev by thread: Re: "Grammarian" 'oS nuq
• Next by thread: Re: "Grammarian" 'oS nuq
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level