tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 07 00:11:52 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Alan Anderson's chenmoHchoH

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Alan Anderson's chenmoHchoH
• Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 03:11:15 -0500

Alan Anderson wrote on Jan 4 1997 at 8:38:08 in a reply to the message
entitled {ghu' wotmey}:

qay'nuq?  qatlh Dayu' 'e vIjaychu', ghoblu'meh 'etlhmey moy'bi' je neH
lo'lu'taHvIS.  'ach ngat 'oghlu'DI', qul'a'na' luchenmoHchoH noHmey.

I question the use of the word luchenmoHchoH above.  I suggest luchenchoHmoH
instead.  Unless we can assume that chenmoH is one (1) verb upon which to
affix suffixes, I must assume the root was {chen} and the type 3 {-choH} must
precede the type 4 -{moH}.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alan Anderson's chenmoHchoH
    • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: How far is it?
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Translation Practice
• Prev by thread: How far is it? - Reply
• Next by thread: Re: Alan Anderson's chenmoHchoH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level