tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 21 08:06:01 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Glen Proechel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 17:24:13 -0800
>From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
>
>Kenneth Traft writes:
>
>>Glen is my friend and when he asks me to post things "I WILL". If I see
>>something that I think would be nice to share with the list, I'll post it.
>>It's an open forum right?
>
>Hoch wIqellaHba' maja'chuqbogh maH. 'ej Hoch wIqelbej.
>'ach nunuQ ja'chuqQo'wI' qatlh 'e' wIchaw'nIS?
>qechmeyDaj DIQoy neHlaw' 'ach qechmeymaj Qoy neHbe'law'.
>
>I'd like to think so. Unfortunately, the way it works with Glen seems
>to be more of a "toss in a rock and make waves" situation. He doesn't
>participate in the debate, but he has his ideas posted here. I wonder
>why someone would do that, and I tend to conclude that he isn't really
>interested in others' ideas.
Hey, it's a half-a-loaf situation. Ideally, it would be better if Glen
could participate in the conversation. I don't mean to put intent into his
mind, so I can't say that he agrees with me, but I, at least, agree with
you that it would be better if Glen could converse and not speak one-way.
But the fact is, he can't. His real-life situation and connectivity
precludes it. Tough. But at least he can do SOMEthing, and participate
indirectly, through Ken, etc. It's inconvenient, but at least he IS
participating, to the extent he can. He also presumably sees the responses
which Ken is able to relay back to him. It's not as clean as the usual
method of conversation here, but like I said, at least it's something.
~mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQB1AwUBMw3H4sppGeTJXWZ9AQHrrwL/W2VSbvwBqcyi6N/1Q3A/GCccx1wHiuRf
S+/sDrgl7JtYylV9wxPN+k9so0Nu+xfDoJK7U6EdkSwkrK0YIFr2Nfej7AQcwyWy
/WTnYs7W39d+t1nlBKbavfFGnx2cNqan
=4+Ly
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----