ghItlh peHruS:
>As to {latlh}, I submit substituting {chuvbogh} for "that which is left
>over."
No, "thing which is left over" would be {chuvwI'}.
The controversial status of headless relative clauses isn't even an issue.
>We may come up with tera'nganvaD chuvbogh Huch nobHa'.
Yes, now that you've added a definite subject, {-bogh} makes sense.
-- ghunchu'wI'