tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 18 00:35:47 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nobHa' (was: tach Such)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: nobHa' (was: tach Such)
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 03:35:16 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-02-13 15:40:45 EST, HomDoq writes:
<< > Here, {nobHa'} means "ungive."
>
is this canon? I understand {nobHa'} in a way that the _Subject_ is
taking back what the (Ind) _Object_ had been given before (not necessarily
by Subject though)
and if you want to say, "well, that would be {yaHmoH}", I think the
difference is in the perceived order of events, thus
{nob} gives - {nobHa'} takes back
{yaHmoH} takes away - {yaHHa'moH} gives back
(but I don't think you could use {yaHHa'moH} for the bartender example,
_maybe_, just maybe, {HevHa'} as in {tera'nganvaD latlh HevHa'}.) >>
Thanks for bringing up {HevHa'}. You did not add {lajHa'} to your list.
TKW uses {nobHa'} literally for "gives back."
My concern is over the meaning of {yaHHa'}. I have looked at {yaH} as
different from {nge'}: To me {yaH} feels like "being lessened," yaH wa'
ghot loDvam jen law' Hoch jen puS renders as "This man is the
next-to-tallest." tera'ngan loDvo' cha' DeQ nge'pu' chom renders as "The
bartender took two credits from the Earth man."
peHruS batlh Sachjaj tlhIngan wo' tlhIngan Hol je