tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 16 11:29:13 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC Challenge: similar suffixes
- From: "Doneq" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC Challenge: similar suffixes
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 20:17:28 +0100
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
- Priority: normal
ghItlh Qov
> }>bIpujmo' QaghlIjmo' bIbIQ
> }>(Because you are weak, you are sad because of your mistake.)
> }>[That last one was tough. I hope I came close.]
> }
[pe']
> I quite liked it. I see the acceptable sentence {QaghlIjmo' bI'IQ} with the
> acceptable clause {bIpujmo'} explaining the reason for the second sentence.
> bIpujbe'chugh QaghlIjmo' bI'IQbe'. HoSwI' nuQbe' QaghDaj. If both the noun
> and the verb were indicated as caues of the same effect it would certainly
> be icky, as occured with the one who tried to fit all ten suffixes into one
> sentence. :)
I didn't even occur to me that the first clause could explain a
second, which explains the main clause... I must admit I think this
sentence is much better than mine.
/Doneq
______
yIvoq 'ach yI'ol