tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 12 10:09:26 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: HIvqa' veqlargh!



[email protected] on behalf of Neal Schermerhorn wrote:

> Unless KGT tells me differently, doesn't 'o' sort of act as a slang for
> 'rear' in the anatomical sense? I am not suggesting this is a legitamite
> gloss of 'o', but it is certainly understood by the users of this list. I
> agree with those who point out its spurious nature, but I do think clear
> communication leaves room for a little intelligible slang.

It's slang used on the list, but there's no way to say that it's slang used by 
*Klingons*.

-- 
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97614.5


Back to archive top level