tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 30 18:17:17 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: be'pu' loDpu' je

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: be'pu' loDpu' je
• Date: 30 Apr 97 21:16:10 EDT

ghItlh peHruS
> Although TKD expresses that two
>complete sentences fit together by starting the second with {'e'} to refer
>back to the previous one, how have we determined we can use {'e'} to begin a
>wholly new sentence?  Even though it refers to a previous topic, can we start
>a wholly new sentence with it?
>
>Comments, please.

ST6:  'e' neHbe' vavwI'.
Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: Must
• Next by Date: jabI'IDghomvam vIlaDqa'
• Prev by thread: Re: be'pu' loDpu' je
• Next by thread: RE: Loose translation "Under foot"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level