tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 29 05:28:33 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: family suffixes
- From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: family suffixes
- Date: 29 Apr 97 08:26:57 EDT
ghItlh charghwI'
>>nalqaD - mate challenge (n) {KCD} {HolQeD v5n1p20} (That's the
>>random list of words at end of that issue of HolQeD).
>
>Meanwhile, there is no word {*nal*} all by itself, to my
>knowledge.
Hmmm... does that mean we might be able to construct compound words with that?
(As canonical as other compound words of ours.) Such as... let me think...
"naltay" for "marriage"?
Qapla'
qoror