tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 22 09:16:54 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: family suffixes
- From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: family suffixes
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 11:15:25 -0500 (CDT)
: ghItlh mIqIraH
: >jatlh ~mark:
: >
: >> Hmm. Can't say about this one. At least you didn't say "*nal", which
: >> would have been more intuitive. BUT Okrand (in TKW, if I recall correctly)
: >> tells us that -nal is a bound morpheme, which doesn't occur on its own.
: >> NOTE: the previous sentence was straight out of my fuzzy memory: someone
: >> please double-check.
: >
: >I also recall this, let me check... a quick scan of TKW turned up
: >nothing, but I know its there somewhere. I just flipped through really
: >fast looking for a bold-print {nal} and didn't find anything. However,
: >I am absolutely positive that you quoted Okrand correctly, regardless of
: >source.
:
: I agree with you, but I just took a more comprehensive look for proverbs
: regarding family, but there was nothing. It's probably not from TKW. Maybe
: somewhere else though.
: qoror
It's from the KCD audio for {nalqaD} (and surely on charghwI's KLI New Word
page as well).
-- Voragh