tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 21 11:54:17 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj

• From: "Marc Paige"<[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 13:40:55 -0500

ja' ghunchu'wI'
>>>
toH, Sughompa', SanDaj Sovlu'chu''a'?
'ej DIv'a' pumwI''e'? Hujlaw' ghu'vam.

><Texas>Daq maH vaj pumwI' Huplu' 'e' wIwuq

"Texas"-Daq qapumchugh 'ach bIDIvbe', jIH vIHuplu''a'?
<<<

ghobe'. bIDIvbe'chugh vaj vay' Hupbe'lu'

BTW, What should I have used instead of pumwI' for the "accused"?

pumwI' = accuser (wrong in my usage)
pummoHboghwI' ?= accused (i.e. one who causes accusation)
ghot pumlu' = person they accuse (I like this one the best so far)

He's not a <HeSwI'> until proven guilty right? (At least in the US system).

---------------
SI'IluD
wa'Hu' jIboghbe'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Power Klingon
    • From: fonseca <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: KLBC: first log
• Next by Date: KLBC: Highlander quotes
• Prev by thread: Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj
• Next by thread: Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level