tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 15 11:42:22 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC: be'pu'

• From: DaQtIq <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC: be'pu'
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 14:41:06 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Mago-vaD jang SuStel:
>> chaHmo' bechbe'bogh loD jISovbe'
>>   (I don't know any man who hasn't suffered because of them)
>
>Watch that verb prefix on {Sov}!  You might want an aspect suffix here, too:
>
>chaHmo' bechpu'be'bogh loD vISovbe'.
>
>Good sentence!
>
>mu'meylIjmo' DuparchoHbe' be' SaH 'e' vItul.

ramqu'! mu'meyDajmo' parchoHchugh be' vaj buSHa'nIS Mago.

be'nalqoqwI'vaD jImagh'eghpu'. vIQuchmoHtaH 'e' vInID 'ej DuHbe'.
vIQuchmoHtaHmeH latlh loD vImojnIS 'ej jIlujba'. be' ngaghmeH,
choHchugh loD, magh'eghbej!

bIquv'eghmoHchugh vaj DuneH be' DaneHbogh.

- DaQtIq

• References:
  • RE: KLBC: be'pu'
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2 consonants in a row
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: be'pu'
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC: be'pu'
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: be'pu'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level