tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Sep 28 10:25:00 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
(KLBC) Re: nIDwIj wa'DIch
- From: [email protected] (HoD trI'Qal)
- Subject: (KLBC) Re: nIDwIj wa'DIch
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 13:25:47 -0400
At 04:04 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Dark Viper wrote:
At least you did your corrections in Klingon, which is something. {{:)
>At 04:13 AM 9/3/96 -0700, [Volodiya A Reid] wrote:
>>jIpongegh Volodiya. AlaskaDaq jIyIn.
>
>bIHech:
>
>*Volodiya* 'oH pongwIj'e'. *Alaska*Daq jIyIn.
Please see the reply I sent to this person. Although what you have for "my
name is" is generally more acceptible, because we are SURE how to use it, it
does NOT make her use of <pong> as a verb invalid. I much prefer to give
the reasons *why* we do things the way we do, rather than just say "this is
the way it is", as you seem to have done here (probably because your Klingon
skills aren't up to saying all of that; I would be very hard-put to do all
my corrections in Klingon--Qanqor quv I am NOT!)
>>ghojwI' jIH. holmey vIHad.
>
> ....... .... Holmey vIHaD.
>
>(QaghmeylIj tIbej)
Well, we all should... nice sentence, there; you remembered that tI- is the
imperative with a plural "it" object. maj!
>>qatlho'
>
>(mu' nuq?)
>
>..qar'a'?
Not at all. <tlho'> is in the addendum of your KD. It means "to thank". {{:)
--tQ
---
HoD trI'Qal, tlhIngan wo' Duj lIy So' ra'wI'
Captain T'rkal, Commander IKV Hidden Comet (Klingon speaker and net junkie!)
HaghtaHbogh tlhIngan yIvoqQo'! toH... qatlh HaghtaH Qanqor HoD???
monlI'bogh tlhInganbe' yIvoqQo'! SoHvaD monlI' trI'Qal...