tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 29 08:59:46 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
KLBC: clarify?
> > > Just an educated guess from a new veSwI'. (Warrior? Not in TKD.)
> >
> > Sure it is! Page 191. (You've got the 1992 edition with the white cover,
> > right?)
>
> bIlughbe', jupwI'.
> TKD nav 191 yInuDqa', SuStel!
> <veSwI'> vItu'laHbe'.
{translating}
"You are not right, my friend.
Re-examine page 191 of TKD, <SuStel>!"
{/translating}
Now, could someone shed some light on <vItu'laHbe'>? I recognize
the <vI-> prefix, and the <-be'> suffix, but can't decipher <-tu'->, or
decide if <-laH-> is supposed to be a suffix or <laH> (ability).
_________________________________________
/ _ \ \ ** Andrew Netherton **
\__)| "VENI, VIDI VINNIE" \ __ University of Waterloo
\ I came, I saw my cousin. |(_ \ Ontario, Canada
\_____________________________________\___/ (519) 885-2717