tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 26 02:29:55 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC:loDDoq
- From: "Adrian (HurghwI')" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC:loDDoq
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 04:31:32 -0600
At 04:12 PM 11/25/96 -0800, you wrote:
>jatlh HurghwI': (*shrug* it's under KLBC . . .)
>
>> tlhIngan Hol bIlo'chugh, Hoch jIjatlh.
>
>The only time I would use {Hoch jIjatlh} is when the *quotation* is the word
>{Hoch}. Thus, you said the word {Hoch}. Otherwise (and assuming {jatlh} can
>take an object other than a language}, you'd need to use the {vI-} prefix.
>(It's confusing, I agree, and we're really not sure how accurate this is.
>There's a possible counter-example in the beginning of Power Klingon, but it's
>spoken by a bumbling Earther . . .)
>
>> vaj, wa'cha' loS ben jIbogh!
>
><vaj, wa'maH loS ben jIbogh yIjatlh> bIjatlh DaneH, qar'a'?
ghobe'. 'oH vIHech.
>> "tlhIngan Hol Mailing List"-Daq loDHom neH 'e' vIQub.
bIlugh.
<<"tlhIngan Hol Mailing List"-Daq 'oHlaw'pu' loDHom neH>> vIjatlh vIHechpu'.
>nuqjatlh? I don't think you intended {neH} to be a verb, so what *is* the
>verb? And why do you keep using {'e' vIQub} when {-law'} does the same thing,
>and is built into the language?
I'm too used to saying that in English. It is a habit I must get rid of.
>> DaH qaSovmo', jIQuch.
>
>maj.
>
>tlhIngan Hol ghojchoHchugh wa'maH loS ben loDHom, vaj HoSghajchoH Holmaj!
>tugh loQ Holvam Sovlaw' Hoch'e'! heh heh.
{vaj} 'ut'a'? mu'tlheghlIj tlhaQ vIyajbe'. qatlh tlhaQ 'oH? teH 'oH!
>SuStel
>Beginners' Grammarian
>Stardate 96903.2
-HurghwI'
Hovjaj 96903.7
|
|
| \ HurghwI'
.-| |-. -------
/ / \ \ [email protected]
|_,\ / | http://www.jwp.bc.ca/peregrine
/ \\ //\_|__
| ___\\// /
|/ \ `----'
`-.__.-`