tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 22 22:46:23 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: nuq
- From: "Adrian (HurghwI')" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: nuq
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:31:08 -0600
At 03:03 PM 11/20/96 -0800, you wrote:
>vIng HurghwI':
vIngbe' jIH jay'!
>> What's wrong with the OTHER translation I offered which everyone has
>> ignored?
>> DaH maHvaD Ha'DIbaHmeylIj HI'ang!
>> "Show your meats to us now!"
>
>What's wrong is that it really should be {DaH maHvaD Ha'DIbaHlIj tI'ang}. I'd
>also (grudgingly) accept {DaH Ha'DIbaHlIj gho'ang}.
bIlugh. Doch mughbogh tera'ngan puj rur mu'tlhegh mughbogh jIH lujatlh.
'ach, qay 'oH Dochvam'e'. not jIlugh vIjatlh.
>Whether {Ha'DIbaH} is made explicitly plural is irrelevant. There are
>obviously going to be more than one (in the context), otherwise one would not
>bother even uttering this sentence. What I've changed, though is the verb
>prefixes. What you had written came out more like "Show me your meats to us
>now."
DuHbogh ghu'mey law' tu'lu'. jIqar. nIvbe''a' 'oH?
>SuStel
>Beginners' Grammarian
>Stardate 96889.5
-Adrian K
Hovjaj 96895.2
|
|
| \ HurghwI'
.-| |-. vogh vIghoSchugh, pa' SoH
/ / \ \ [email protected]
|_,\ / | http://www.jwp.bc.ca/peregrine
/ \\ //\_|__
| ___\\// /
|/ \ `----'
`-.__.-`