tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 21 13:28:54 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Engishization of Klingon (Was: RE: KLBC a phrase about Honor)




On Wed, 20 Nov 1996, Qov wrote:

> At 09:19 18/11/96 -0800, ter'eS wrote:
> 
> }
> }I'm not sure what my point is here, except that it seems that Okrand has 
> }lost his original inspiration for Klingon, and his choices are making it 
> }more and more like English as he goes along.
> 
> jIQochbe', te'reS.  pIj DIvI' mu' rurqu' tlhIngan mu', meq tu'be'lu'taHvIS.
> [pe']
> tlhIngan Hol chenmoHlaH Okrand neH 'e' wIwuq 'ach Holmaj
> Qorgh neHbe'law'mo' jImogh.
> 
> SKI: Qov agrees and is frustrated by it.
> ---

I wonder if there's any chance of Okrand ever turning "maintenance" of 
his language over to a third party?  (Probably, if it stops making 
money!)  But seriously, the KLI would be the logical entity.  I have a 
recurring fantasy of this happening.

Before you dismiss the idea out of hand, consider: the KLI has already 
established canon, by defining Marc Okrand as its only source.  The KLI 
has become the official organ for new canon beyond TKD.  We rejected the 
pIn tIn's approach, we decide which Paramount projects do or don't 
represent canonical additions to the Hol.  Any users of 
the Hol outthere who are unaware of the KLI and the new canon Okrand has 
given us we would not consider to be speaking proper Klingon (especially 
if they're influenced by the nonsense on the "star Trek" shows).  If the 
KLI were authorized to take a more aggressive role in defining canon or 
deciding grammar, it would be only an extension of its existing role.

The main danger in this would be dissention in the ranks, especially if 
one's favorite construction were disallowed.  We would need a rigorous 
process fair to all involved for deciding issues, and the discipline of 
Klingon warriors to abide by the KLI's decisions.  But I'd rather have 
the Hol in the hands of people I trust, who have the skill and the love 
of the language to do right by it, than in the erratic hands it's in 
now.  (Am I the only one dismayed by Okrand's musing (threat?) that 
Klingon orthography might not be alphabetic?)

But I expect I'll meet Kahless in my dreams before I see this happen...

 > Qov (Robyn Stewart)   [email protected]    tlhIngan Hol ghojwI' > 
>

-- ter'eS 


Back to archive top level