tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 18 14:26:16 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: RE: RE: KLBC:Quotes
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: RE: RE: KLBC:Quotes
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 17:18:59 -0500 ()
- Priority: NORMAL
On Sat, 16 Nov 1996 16:36:41 -0800 David Trimboli
<[email protected]> wrote:
> jatlh charghwI':
>
> > <muHoHbewI'
> > > > muHoSmoHbej.>
...
> If you *can* do it (which I am really unsure of now), then there's another
> problem. *{muHoHbe'wI' muHoSmoHbe'bej} doesn't have the object prefix
> matching the object. The prefix says the object should be "me," but the
> object is a thing.
Ummm. You added a {-be'} which was not there before and you
didn't seem to notice that the word order is reversed. His
really ugly noun is supposed to be the subject of his verb, but
it preceeds it.
> mu'tlheghvamqoq yIlIjbej!
QaQ qeSvam.
> SuStel
> Beginners' Grammarian
> Stardate 96878.2
charghwI'