tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 26 11:32:54 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: New here

• From: Scott McCool <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: New here
• Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 14:40:10 -0400 (EDT)
• cc: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
• In-Reply-To: <v01520d03adcd3e5eeb53@[205.139.170.201]>

>bImevchu'.  pay' bImevmo' tlhIngan Darur.  mu' lI'be' law' Dalo'be'.
>vaj qatlh <nuqneH> Dajatlh bItaghDI' SoH?  wa' tlhIngan Hol mu' Dalo',
>'ach mu'vetlh Dalo'Ha'.
>
>You stop clearly.  Because you stop suddenly, you resemble a Klingon.
>You don't use many useless words.
>
>So why do you say {nuqneH} when *you* begin?  You used one Klingon
>word, but you misused that word.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj    

I was under the impression that it was a traditional greeting.
I was misstaken.

Scott

• References:
  • Re: New here
    • From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)

• Prev by Date: Mail rejected - OzEmail account disabled
• Next by Date: 'a'
• Prev by thread: Re: New here
• Next by thread: Re: New here
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level