tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 23 21:18:35 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Re[2]: NuqneH! chu' jIH

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Re[2]: NuqneH! chu' jIH
• Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 00:15:55 -0400

In a message dated 96-05-21 14:57:00 EDT, you write:

>Okay, assuming that is the case (and I'm sure Paramount's lawyers
>would be happy to dispute the point),  who can afford to take the
>time to write up such a full treatment and then make it available for
>free?  If it's not free, then there's not much point, is there, since
>we already have TKD.  
>
>

primer* grammar* je vIghItlhta' 'ej Huch vIpoQbe'
boje' boneHchugh jIHvaD yIra'

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re[2]: NuqneH! chu' jIH
    • From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: loQ jIDachlaw'lI' (KLBC)
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC:Microsoft
• Prev by thread: RE: NuqneH! chu' jIH
• Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: NuqneH! chu' jIH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level