tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 14 01:43:57 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Just shoot me now...
- From: [email protected] (Daniel Noll)
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Just shoot me now...
- Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 18:43:47 +1000
vIghItlhpu:
>> So is this target in the sentence as {DoSDaq} or {DoSvaD}. The action
>> is at the target, but it is for the target as well [I did not say for the
>> benefit of :]]
ghItlhpu' ghunchu'wI':
> {-vaD} *does* mean "for the benefit of", so if that's not what you want
> to say, that's not what you should say. I emphasized the word "at" in
> my sentence; I would certainly use {-Daq}.
This may seem extremely unconventional, but is the rover {-be} permitted
to follow the {-vaD} suffix? That would make a perfect equivalent of the
phrase "Against" the machine.
Qapla'
Ford
__ / __ / __ / / ____/ Daniel Noll aka Ford Prefect
/ / / / / / / / [email protected]
____/ __ / / / / /
__/ __/ __/__/ __/__/______/ Chaos: yIHo' 'ach yIQaw'