tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 18 13:06:03 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: bom Dogh

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: bom Dogh
• Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 13:54:35 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "[email protected]" at Mar 14, 96 10:05:14 pm

According to [email protected]:
> 
... 
> DungDaq <yeq> Dalo'ta'.  DIvI' Hol mu' 'oH nuq'e'?  nuqDaq mu'vam tu'lu'?

{yeq} is listed in the English to Klingon side of TKD, but not
in the Klingon to English side. Meanwhile, {jIj} has the same
definition and is listed in the Klingon to English side, but
not in the English to Klingon side. Both mean "cooperate".

It is a strange enough error (the only one of its kind) that I
wonder if it is an error at all, or just Maltz's way of
interfering with our ability to cooperate...

> SuStel
> Hovjaj 96202.6

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• References:
  • Re: bom Dogh
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: The Finished stone???
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC-double-object verbs
• Prev by thread: Re: bom Dogh
• Next by thread: Re: nabwIj - tlhIngan wo' batlh(&KLBC)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level