tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 13 17:09:27 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nabwIj - tlhIngan wo' batlh(&KLBC)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: nabwIj - tlhIngan wo' batlh(&KLBC)
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:10:30 -0500
First I want to thank you all for all of the suggestions you gave me for
"nabwIj". Thanks to ghunchu'wI' especially, and addressing you [ghunchu'wI']
specifically, I just want to apologize for any time I might have come accross
as offensive or rude. I really didn't meant to if it seemed that way...No
hard feelings?
Now responing to what ghunchu'wI' said:
>>juppu'wI' bIleghmeH, romuluSnganpu' chargh rotlh law'
>> verenganpu' chargh rotlh puS
>>However, I am not sure even if this one
>> is right...
>{chargh} is a verb, and cannot fit the slot in
>the {law'/puS} construction in which you have
> tried to place it. Try
>{romuluSngan DIcharghmeH Qu' Qatlh
>law' verengan DIcharghmeH Qu' Qatlh puS}
I'm a bit at a loss here. You said that {chargh} is a verb that couldn't
fint into law'/puS construction? But on your sentence we still see {chargh}.
Is this allowed because of the {-meH}? or is it because it is followed by
{Qu'}, a noun?
>>>>"Qu'vatlh! nuqDaq jangrajghach jay' "
>>>nuqjatlh? Where's the verb, and what
>>> do you mean by {jangrajghach}?
>>If {-ghach} makes {jang} a noun?
>> Why couldn't this mean "Where ARE my @#$&
>>replies?"
>First, {-ghach} on a bare verb is weird.
>Okrand says it feels like" pleasureness" would
>in English; the meaning is almost clear, but the
>word is not quite normal. Second, noun
>suffixes go on *nouns*, thus
>would *follow* the {-ghach}.
I'm gathering that other than the wrong suffix placement, I have not quite
understood how to make a verb a noun. Is there some other way to do it? Or
am I missing a point Okrand was trying to make in the TKD?
>I guess I won't complain too strongly
>about the shorthand {nuqDaq 'oH},
>but I'd prefer that beginners keep
>to the most easily understood forms
>until they are very well along with the grammar.
You're absolutely right. A pyramid could not stand without a foundation, and
I must fortify my foundations. (how corny and cliche, yet, it is so fitting
to my problem!) :)
Okey dokey! I understand everything else, even though it took me so long to.
As a great man once said: "D'oh!"
qatho'qa'
Qapla'
-Thiago Miranda