tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 30 10:23:56 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: betleH
- From: Jose Mijares <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: betleH
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 96 13:26:35 -0400
>Subject: Re: betleH
>Sent: 7/29/96 4:30 PM
>Received: 7/30/96 1:23 PM
>From: Dave Yeung, [email protected]
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: Multiple recipients of list, [email protected]
>
>On Sun, 28 Jul 1996, Roger Cheesbro wrote:
>
>Chet Braun wrote:
>>
>>...In the process of working out a number of sets for the betleH and
>practicing
>>applications, attacks, blocks, and counter attacks I've come to the
conclusion
>>that the betleH is more usefull against weapons *other* than another betleH.
>>Two betleHmey tend to get 'tangled' too easily. Against a weapon like a
>
>tlhInganpu' *porghQeD wIyajchu''a'? chay' SuvDI' tlhIngan vIH porghDaj
>'e' wISov'a'? "QaQbe' betleH" wIjatlhmeH yap'a' Sovmaj?
>
>I was trying to say: Do we know enough about Klingon physiology to say
>that "a bat'leth is no good for combat"? I can't find a word for
>physiology, so I used {porghQeD} for "body science", after {HolQeD} for
>"linguistics". Anyways my point was that even if we "bumbling Terrans"
>get our bat'leths tangled, that doesn't mean that Klingons do because
>their bodies may be constructed differently.
>
> ----------
> dave yeung
>{toD Duj 'oH toDuj'e'}
>Courage is a ship to the rescue
>
Ok, [email protected] and [email protected] are the same
persons, the mailer change autamtily the name, please unsuscribe me of
this list.
thank
Jose Mijares
Jose Mijares
Sysop LogicOnline BBS..El BBS de los usuarios Macintosh. Telf 582-238-2803
_________________________________________________________________________
[email protected] | [email protected] | Sysop@4:890/7.fidonet
_________________________________________________________________________
Si quieres un cambio, no hagas siempre lo mismo (Albert Einsten) :-)