tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 29 05:50:32 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: 'olImpIqDaq jor peng
- From: "A.Appleyard" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: 'olImpIqDaq jor peng
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 13:49:47 GMT
- Organization: Materials Science Centre
- Priority: normal
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 05:39:28 -0700
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
> Subject: 'olImpIqDaq jor peng
>
> <ACOG> vIqeltaHvIS jIbep, 'ach Doj HungDaj. Heghmo' cha' ghotpu' jI'IQqu',
> 'ach . . .
>
> I have to resort to English. Sorry for the insufficiently Klingon post, but
> it's a follow up to one in Klingon, at least.
>
> Despite my recent diatribe against the Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games
> on this list, I have to say that the way their security responded to
> the bomb on Saturday morning was very impressive. It's tragic that two
> people lost their lives, and I'm very saddened and outraged that
> someone would do such a thing - attack innocent people in a public
> place! No political target, no agenda - not that either of those would
> excuse the act, but this is even worse. Just hurting and killing people
> because one *can*, just to show power, or something. muropmeH. But
> the fact that the security saw the bomb, identified it, and had started
> clearing the area - the fact that they noticed it at all, in a place
> that size, with a crowd that size - is impressive. It could have been
> so much worse; the potential was there for a death toll worse than that
> of TWA flight 800. I know that's no consolation to the families of the
> two people who died; there is no consolation. But I'm nonetheless
> impressed by the outcome.
>
> For this tragedy, I do not blame ACOG. They've mismanaged an awful lot
> during these games, but there was just no way they could have done a
> better job securing the park, at least not and still have it be
> worthwhile to go there. I remember the public debate about the park,
> whether or not it was a good idea from a security perspective. I
> remember the decision to have it as an open area, free to the public,
> no tickets required - despite the infeasibility of tight access
> controls in such an environment. And I still think that was the right
> decision. With tickets to the Opening Ceremonies upwards of $600,
> and with the rest of the "Olympic Ring" already more of an armed camp
> than a celebration, such a place was needed.
>
> DaH jIrIn. After what I said Friday, I just wanted to give credit
> where credit is due. As for the taHqeq who did this - meQjaj nuch
> jay'! (<<SaDlogh loQ megh nuch>> 'e' vISov, 'ach yapbe'.)
>
> -marqoS
>
>
>
> --
> Mark J. Reed |
> Email: [email protected] | HP Internet/System Security Lab
> Voice: +1 404 648 9535 | 2957 Clairmont Rd Suite 220
> Fax : +1 404 648 9516 | Atlanta GA 30329-1647 USA