tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 30 10:44:18 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -wI'
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: -wI'
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:44:16 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from MarcRuehlaender on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:58:57 -0800)
>Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:58:57 -0800
>From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
>My personal argument for this is that if you say
>Verb-wI' means thing which does Verb = thing which verbs
>why shouldn't it work with to be? i.e.
>thing which does be green = thing which is green
Personally, I tend to see it this way. But I could be wrong.
~mark